資訊報(bào)名信息成績(jī)查詢考試大綱準(zhǔn) 考 證課程:免費(fèi)試聽(tīng)招生方案報(bào)名流程網(wǎng)校名師

指南報(bào)名條件報(bào)名時(shí)間考試時(shí)間考試內(nèi)容復(fù)習(xí):考試試題備考經(jīng)驗(yàn)每日一練考試論壇

首頁(yè)>會(huì)計(jì)網(wǎng)校>職稱英語(yǔ)>備考指導(dǎo)> 正文

2009年職稱英語(yǔ)綜合類教材新增部分內(nèi)容(七)

2009-2-9 14:12 正保會(huì)計(jì)網(wǎng)!  】【打印】【我要糾錯(cuò)

 [1] [2] [3] [4]

 第六部分 完形填空(共四篇)

  第六篇

Gun Rights in the US

  Immediately after the shooting at Virginia Tech University, Americans gathered to mourn the dead. The president and the state governor both hurried there to share the 1 . But the majority of Americans still cling to their right to 2 weapons.

  Strictly speaking, the US is not the only country 3 gun violence has destroyed lives, families and communities in everyday circumstance. But the US is one of the 4 countries that seems unwilling and politically incapable of doing anything serious to stop it.

  In countries like Britain and Canada, the government adopted stricter 5 control soon after serious gun violence incidents. US leaders, however, are held 6 by the gun lobby and the electoral system.

  The powerful National Rifle Association, the major supporter of gun 7 in the US, is too strong for any party to take on. Most Republicans oppose gun controls anyway. 8 the years; the Democrats have found that they can either campaign for gun control or win power, not 9 ; they prefer power.

  According to the US Bureau of Justice Statistics, firearm incidents accounted 10 nine percent of the 4.7 million violent crimes in 2005. So, although opinion polls show most Americans want stricter gun laws, many don't want to give up their arms they 11 to protect themselves.

  Dave Hancock, a Virginia gun lover, is one example. In an interview he said. "If one professor in Virginia incident had been carrying a legal weapon they might have been able to 12 all this." In his opinion, the massacre is an argument for more people to carry weapons, not fewer.

  But at the root of Americans' clinging to the fight to bear arms is not just a fear of crime, but a mistrust of 13 , commented UK's Guardian newspaper.

  One Virginia resident, who had a permit to carry a concealed firearm, told the Guardian that it was 14 American's responsibility to have a gun.

  "Each person," he said, "should not rely solely 15 the government for protection."

  詞匯:

  mourn v.致哀

  lobby n.院外活動(dòng)集團(tuán)

  electoral adj.選舉的

  firearm n.火器

  massacre n./v.大屠殺

  練習(xí):

  1. A) ceremony B) funeral C) tears D) grief

  2. A) make B) own C) destroy D) trade

  3. A) while B) which C) where D) that

  4. A) few B) some C) much D) little

  5. A) rifle B) knife C) bullet D) gun

  6. A) prisoner B) hostage C) person D) home

  7. A) fire B) attacks C) rights D) violence

  8. A) Over B) Since C) Till D) Until

  9. A) both B) either C) each D) one

  10. A) of B) off C) for D) out

  11. A) hide B) buy C) sell D) keep

  12. A) control B) stop C) handle D)treat

  13. A) government B) guards C) students D) professors

  14. A) many B) few C) every D) all

  15. A) on B) in C) at D) from

  答案與題解:

  1.D “share the grief”是“同悲”。share是“跟他人擁有同樣的情感”的意思。整個(gè)句子說(shuō)的是,總統(tǒng)和州長(zhǎng)兩人都趕到那里跟大家一樣悲痛。

  2.B 這四個(gè)選項(xiàng)填入后,四個(gè)句子在句法和語(yǔ)義上都是成立的。但是,從整個(gè)文章來(lái)考察,只有“0wn”是合適的選擇,全文主要討論美國(guó)公民是否有權(quán)擁有槍支。

  3.C 該句子的從句本身是一個(gè)完整的事件,如果還要附加一些東西的話,只能是事件發(fā)生的地點(diǎn),因此用“where”。整個(gè)句子說(shuō)的是:嚴(yán)格說(shuō)來(lái),美國(guó)是唯一一個(gè)每天都會(huì)發(fā)生槍支暴力摧毀生命、家庭和社區(qū)的國(guó)家。

  4.A “But”引入的命題跟上一個(gè)句子表達(dá)的命題構(gòu)成反比,因此需用“few”。

  5.D 本文討論槍支,因此“knife”和“bullet”可以排除。“rilfe”是來(lái)復(fù)槍,即步槍“gun”是槍支,比“rifle”的覆蓋面大,因此用“gun”是對(duì)的。

  6.B “to be held hostage”是“扣為人質(zhì)”。整個(gè)句子說(shuō)的是:然而,美國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人受制于槍支院外活動(dòng)集團(tuán)和選舉制度。

  7.C 本文討論的就是“槍支擁有權(quán)”,因此填入“rights”是對(duì)的。這個(gè)句子有點(diǎn)難。“take Oil”是“斗爭(zhēng)”。整個(gè)句子說(shuō)的是:強(qiáng)大的國(guó)家來(lái)復(fù)槍協(xié)會(huì),是美國(guó)槍支擁有權(quán)的主要支持者,它太強(qiáng)大了,沒(méi)有一個(gè)政黨敢于跟它斗爭(zhēng)的。

  8.A “the years”是一段時(shí)間。“0ver”表示“跨越”,因此在語(yǔ)義上是協(xié)調(diào)的。合起就是“在過(guò)去的一些年里”。“since”起始的時(shí)間狀語(yǔ)也是一個(gè)段時(shí)間狀語(yǔ),但是它要求出現(xiàn)的是一個(gè)時(shí)間點(diǎn),如2001年,指從2001年到現(xiàn)在。因此“0ver”是對(duì)的。

  9.A 特別提請(qǐng)注意的是:對(duì)于“(either)…or…”的意義語(yǔ)言學(xué)家是有爭(zhēng)議的,一種意見(jiàn)認(rèn)為“0r”是不兼容的,另一種意見(jiàn)認(rèn)為“0r”是兼容的。所謂不兼容,就是說(shuō),要么是“gun control”,要么是“win power”,而不可能是“gun control and win power”;所謂兼容,就是,“gun control”、“win power”和“gun control and win power”這三種情況都可以?梢钥闯觯诒疚淖髡呖磥(lái),“0r”是兼容的,所以才有后一句話:not both(不是二者兼有)。

  10.C “account”作動(dòng)詞時(shí),后面跟“for”。

  11.D 此處應(yīng)該用一個(gè)狀態(tài)動(dòng)詞,只有“keep”是狀態(tài)動(dòng)詞。

  12.B “stop”在這里是最合適的詞。整個(gè)句子說(shuō)的是:在一次專訪中他說(shuō),如果弗吉尼亞事件中有位教授帶了一支合法的槍支的話,他們就有可能阻止所有這一切的發(fā)生。

  13.A “mistrust”是“不信任”。

  14.C “very”和“all”意思相近,但“every”是對(duì)的,因?yàn)?ldquo;American”用的是單數(shù)。

  15.A “rely”和“on”是固定搭配。

責(zé)任編輯:逐夢(mèng)