掃碼下載APP
及時(shí)接收考試資訊及
備考信息
安卓版本:8.7.31 蘋(píng)果版本:8.7.31
開(kāi)發(fā)者:北京正保會(huì)計(jì)科技有限公司
應(yīng)用涉及權(quán)限:查看權(quán)限>
APP隱私政策:查看政策>
HD版本上線:點(diǎn)擊下載>
?。╞) Precedent in Civil Law
If Common Law judges look to previous cases in order to find law, judges in Civil Law systems look to legislation or general codes for guidance as to what the law is.
Thus the usual distinction to be made between the two systems is that the former, common law system, tends to be case centred and hence judge centred, whilst the latter focuses on legislation rather than judges. As a consequence the Common Law system is seen as allowing scope for a discretionary, ad hoc, pragmatic approach to the particular problems that appear before the courts; whereas the latter, civil law system, tends to be a codified body of general abstract principles which control the exercise of judicial discretion. In reality, both of these views are extremes, with the former over-emphasising the extent to which the common law judge can impose their discretion and the latter under-estimating the extent to which continental judges have the power to exercise judicial discretion. Also within the Common Law the focus on case law tends to lead to an underestimation of the extent to which contemporary law is the product of legislation, whilst within the Civil Law system the focus on legislation and codes tends to underestimate the lack of completeness in such systems: a lack of completeness that has necessarily to be filled in by the judiciary.
The prime form of judicial reasoning within the Civil Law system is a deductive one within which the judge is required to apply the general principles stated in the legislation to the facts of the situation. Where the case involves a new problem that has never been the subject of a legal case, the judge is supposed merely to apply the principles of the ruling legislation to those facts in order to reach a decision. The source of the law is therefore the legislation not previous judgements; consequently precedent has no place in such a system. However, as a matter of practice, consistency does tend to develop and judges within Civil Law systems will follow previous decisions. The point is that they are now required to do so.
Jessie主講:《FR 財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告》免費(fèi)聽(tīng)
張宏遠(yuǎn)主講:《MA 管理會(huì)計(jì)》免費(fèi)聽(tīng)
何 文主講:《SBL 戰(zhàn)略商業(yè)領(lǐng)袖》免費(fèi)聽(tīng)
歷年樣卷
考試大綱
詞匯表
報(bào)考指南
考官文章
思維導(dǎo)圖
安卓版本:8.7.31 蘋(píng)果版本:8.7.31
開(kāi)發(fā)者:北京正保會(huì)計(jì)科技有限公司
應(yīng)用涉及權(quán)限:查看權(quán)限>
APP隱私政策:查看政策>
HD版本上線:點(diǎn)擊下載>
官方公眾號(hào)
微信掃一掃
官方視頻號(hào)
微信掃一掃
官方抖音號(hào)
抖音掃一掃
初級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)職稱(chēng) 報(bào)名 考試 查分 備考 題庫(kù)
中級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)職稱(chēng) 報(bào)名 考試 查分 備考 題庫(kù)
高級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)師 報(bào)名 考試 查分 題庫(kù) 評(píng)審
注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師 報(bào)名 考試 查分 備考 題庫(kù)
Copyright © 2000 - odtgfuq.cn All Rights Reserved. 北京正保會(huì)計(jì)科技有限公司 版權(quán)所有
京B2-20200959 京ICP備20012371號(hào)-7 出版物經(jīng)營(yíng)許可證 京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802044457號(hào)