職稱英語考試

切換輔導
您的位置:正保會計網(wǎng)校 301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently


nginx
 > 正文

2010職稱英語考前每日一練[理工類A級-第42期]

2010-01-31 12:56 來源:外語教育網(wǎng) 打印 | 收藏 |
字號

| |

  完形填空題

  第6部分:完形填空 (第51~65題,每題1分,共15分)

  閱讀下面的短文,文中有15處空白,每處空白給出4個選項,請根據(jù)短文的內容從4個選項中選擇1個最佳答案,涂在答題卡相應的位置上。

Science and Truth

  "FINAGLE" is not a word that most people associate with science. One reason is that the image of the scientist is of one who always collects data in an impartial(51) for truth. In any debate - over intelligence, schooling, energy - the(52) "science says" usually disarms opposition.

  But scientists have long acknowledged the existence of a "finagle factor"~ a tendency by many scientists to give a helpful change to the data to (53) desired results. The latest of the finagle factor in action comes from Stephen Jay Gould, a Harvard biologist, (54) has examined the important 19th century work of Dr. Samuel George Morton. Morton was famous in his time(55) analysing the brain size of the skulls as a measure of intelligence. He concluded that whites had the(56) brains, that the brains of Indians and Blacks were smaller, and therefore, that whites constitute a superior race.

  Gould went back to Morton's original data and concluded that the(57) were an example of the finagle at work. He found that Morton's "discovery" was made by leaving out embarrassing data, using incorrect procedures, making simple arithmetical(58) (always in his favour) and changing his criteria - again, always in favour of his argument. Morton has been thoroughly discredited by now and scientists do not believe that brain size reflects(59).

  But Gould went on to say Morton's story is only an example of a common problem in(60) work. Some of the leading figures in science are believed to have(61) the finagle factor. Gould says that Isaac Newton fudged out to support at least three central statements that he could not prove. And so(62) Claudius Ptolemy, the Greek astronomer, whose master work, Almagest, summed up the case for a solar system that had the earth as its center. Recent studies indicate that Ptolemy(63) faked some key data or resorted heavily to the finagle factor.

  All this is(64) because the finagle factor is still at work. For example, in the artificial sweetener controversy, for example, it is said that all the studies sponsored by the sugar industry find that the artificial sweetener is unsafe, while all the studies sponsored by the diet food industry find nothing(65) with it.

  51 A search B learning C teaching D dialogue

  52 A clause B slang C idiom D phrase

  53 A convey B acquire C modify D prove

  54 A whose B she C he D who

  55 A in B about C for D on

  56 A more large B largest C large D larger

  57 A results B experiments C publications D suggestions

  58 A mistakes B misunderstanding C calculation D problems

  59 A creativity B ability C intelligence D ingenuity

  60 A inventive B mental C scientific D manual

  61 A used B rejected C misused D sought

  62 A was B had C could D did

  63 A either B both C neither D never

  64 A necessary B important C available D changeable

  65 A helpful B serious C happy D wrong

  【參考答案】

  51. A  52. D  53. B  54. D  55. C

  56. D  57. A  58. C  59. C  60. C

  61. A  62. D  63. A  64. B  65. D

責任編輯:辛歆
職稱英語報考指南
更多 >
會 搜

學員:chuhero 感謝周涵老師,職稱英語過了。我覺得應該在這里跟老師說聲謝謝,老師的講課很實用,針對性強,是很有學習價值的課程,如果你想通過職稱英語考試,就聽周老師的課程吧。

學員:王仁芝 我去年7月開始差不多從零學起,堅持到考試,考了72分,十分感謝老師及網(wǎng)校的輔導!

學員:lilizhangx 職稱英語通過了!畢業(yè)10年了,沒怎么接觸英語,跟著周涵老師學習,一次通過!

學員:張洪杰 首先感謝周涵老師,好多年沒有學習了,經(jīng)過老師的講解順利過關,這已經(jīng)出乎我的預料,真的很激動,終于沒讓老師們失望,通過了,很高興。

學員:xsqxxlxzj 十多年沒有學習過英語了,通過職業(yè)培訓教育網(wǎng)3個多月的學習,83分通過職稱英語綜合C級考試,非常感謝周涵老師,謝謝您!

學員:best888zhou 畢業(yè)以后就沒有翻過英語了,丟了有七年了,雖然以前基礎還不錯,但這次真的是沒有信心,過年后開始復習,用了差不多一個月的時間,B級綜合考了80分,很開心,謝謝周涵老師的細致講解!

版權聲明

1、凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:正保會計網(wǎng)校”的所有作品,版權均屬正保會計網(wǎng)校所有,未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權不得轉載、鏈接、轉貼或以其他方式使用;已經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權的,應在授權范圍內使用,且必須注明“來源:正保會計網(wǎng)校”。違反上述聲明者,本網(wǎng)將追究其法律責任。

2、本網(wǎng)部分資料為網(wǎng)上搜集轉載,均盡力標明作者和出處。對于本網(wǎng)刊載作品涉及版權等問題的,請作者與本網(wǎng)站聯(lián)系,本網(wǎng)站核實確認后會盡快予以處理。
  本網(wǎng)轉載之作品,并不意味著認同該作品的觀點或真實性。如其他媒體、網(wǎng)站或個人轉載使用,請與著作權人聯(lián)系,并自負法律責任。

3、本網(wǎng)站歡迎積極投稿

4、聯(lián)系方式:

編輯信箱:tougao@chinaacc.com

電話:010-82319999-2110

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 odtgfuq.cn All Rights Reserved. 北京正保會計科技有限公司 版權所有

京B2-20200959 京ICP備20012371號-7 出版物經(jīng)營許可證 京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802044457號