職稱英語考試

切換輔導(dǎo)
您的位置:正保會(huì)計(jì)網(wǎng)校 301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently


nginx
 > 正文

2010職稱英語考前每日一練[理工類A級(jí)-第18期]

2010-01-15 16:26 來源:外語教育網(wǎng) 打印 | 收藏 |
字號(hào)

| |

  完形填空題

Science and Truth

  "FINAGLE" (欺騙) is not a word that most people associate with science. One reason is that the image of the scientist is of one who always       (1) data in an impartial (不偏不倚) search for truth. In any debate -       (2) intelligence, schooling, energy-the phrase "science says" usually disarms opposition.

  But scientists have long acknowledged the existence of a "finagle factor"-a tendency by many scientists to give a helpful change to the data to       (3) desired results. The latest of the finagle factor in action comes from Stephen Jay Gould, a Harvard biologist, who has       (4) the important 19th century work of Dr. Samuel George Morton. Morton was famous in his time for analysing the brain       (5) of the skulls as a measure of intelligence. He concluded that whites had the largest brains, that the brains of Indians and blacks were smaller,and       (6), that whites constitute a superior race.

  Gould went back to Morton's original data and concluded that the       (7) were an example of the finagle at work. He found that Morton's "discovery" was made by leaving out embarrassing data,       (8) incorrect procedures, and changing his criteria - again, always in favour of his argument. Morton has been thoroughly discredited by now and scientists do not believe that brain size reflects       (9).

  But Gould went on to say Morton's story is only an example of a common problem in       (10) work. Some of the leading figures in science are       (11) to have used the finagle factor. Gould says that Isaac Newton fudged out (捏造) to support at least three central statements that he could not prove. And so      (12) Laudius Ptolemy, the Greek astronomer, whose master work, Almagest, summed up the case for a solar system that had the earth as its centre. Recent       (13) indicate that Ptolemy either faked some key data or resorted heavily to the finagle factor.

  All this is important because the finagle factor is still at work. For example, in the artificial sweetener controversy, for example, it is       (14) that all the studies sponsored by the sugar industry find that the artificial sweetener is unsafe,       (15) all the studies sponsored by the diet food industry find nothing wrong with it.

  1 A collects B invents C misuses D enables

  2 A of B over C in D with

  3 A convey B destroy C modify D acquire

  4 A created B written C examined D produced

  5 A size B shape C tissue D cell

  6 A however B then C though D therefore

  7 A results B experiments C ideas D suggestions

  8 A planning B making C using D searching

  9 A creativity B reliability C intelligence D originality

  10 A unusual B mental C scientific D manual

  11 A taught B believed C tried D allowed

  12 A was B had C could D did

  13 A studies B events C developments D decisions

  14 A feared B said C suggested D expected

  15 A if B while C because D although

  【參考答案

  1. A  2. B  3. D  4. C  5. A

  6. D  7. A  8. C  9. C  10. C

  11. B  12. D  13. A  14. B  15. B

責(zé)任編輯:杜楠
職稱英語報(bào)考指南
更多 >
會(huì) 搜

學(xué)員:chuhero 感謝周涵老師,職稱英語過了。我覺得應(yīng)該在這里跟老師說聲謝謝,老師的講課很實(shí)用,針對(duì)性強(qiáng),是很有學(xué)習(xí)價(jià)值的課程,如果你想通過職稱英語考試,就聽周老師的課程吧。

學(xué)員:王仁芝 我去年7月開始差不多從零學(xué)起,堅(jiān)持到考試,考了72分,十分感謝老師及網(wǎng)校的輔導(dǎo)!

學(xué)員:lilizhangx 職稱英語通過了!畢業(yè)10年了,沒怎么接觸英語,跟著周涵老師學(xué)習(xí),一次通過!

學(xué)員:張洪杰 首先感謝周涵老師,好多年沒有學(xué)習(xí)了,經(jīng)過老師的講解順利過關(guān),這已經(jīng)出乎我的預(yù)料,真的很激動(dòng),終于沒讓老師們失望,通過了,很高興。

學(xué)員:xsqxxlxzj 十多年沒有學(xué)習(xí)過英語了,通過職業(yè)培訓(xùn)教育網(wǎng)3個(gè)多月的學(xué)習(xí),83分通過職稱英語綜合C級(jí)考試,非常感謝周涵老師,謝謝您!

學(xué)員:best888zhou 畢業(yè)以后就沒有翻過英語了,丟了有七年了,雖然以前基礎(chǔ)還不錯(cuò),但這次真的是沒有信心,過年后開始復(fù)習(xí),用了差不多一個(gè)月的時(shí)間,B級(jí)綜合考了80分,很開心,謝謝周涵老師的細(xì)致講解!

版權(quán)聲明

1、凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:正保會(huì)計(jì)網(wǎng)!钡乃凶髌,版權(quán)均屬正保會(huì)計(jì)網(wǎng)校所有,未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)載、鏈接、轉(zhuǎn)貼或以其他方式使用;已經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權(quán)的,應(yīng)在授權(quán)范圍內(nèi)使用,且必須注明“來源:正保會(huì)計(jì)網(wǎng)校”。違反上述聲明者,本網(wǎng)將追究其法律責(zé)任。

2、本網(wǎng)部分資料為網(wǎng)上搜集轉(zhuǎn)載,均盡力標(biāo)明作者和出處。對(duì)于本網(wǎng)刊載作品涉及版權(quán)等問題的,請(qǐng)作者與本網(wǎng)站聯(lián)系,本網(wǎng)站核實(shí)確認(rèn)后會(huì)盡快予以處理。
  本網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)載之作品,并不意味著認(rèn)同該作品的觀點(diǎn)或真實(shí)性。如其他媒體、網(wǎng)站或個(gè)人轉(zhuǎn)載使用,請(qǐng)與著作權(quán)人聯(lián)系,并自負(fù)法律責(zé)任。

3、本網(wǎng)站歡迎積極投稿

4、聯(lián)系方式:

編輯信箱:tougao@chinaacc.com

電話:010-82319999-2110

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 odtgfuq.cn All Rights Reserved. 北京正保會(huì)計(jì)科技有限公司 版權(quán)所有

京B2-20200959 京ICP備20012371號(hào)-7 出版物經(jīng)營(yíng)許可證 京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802044457號(hào)